<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judas gets a makeover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/01/judas-gets-a-makeover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/01/judas-gets-a-makeover/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:07:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/01/judas-gets-a-makeover/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=543#comment-514</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;it seems easy to describe satan as either a facet of god or as having independence for the specific purpose of foiling plans&lt;/i&gt;&#160;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;there&#039;s the whole ineffability bit, as described by gaiman and pratchett. &#160;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Posted by&lt;a&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://ssrdatta.blogspot.com&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; TITLE=&quot;sahelidatta at hotmail dot com&quot;&gt;Saheli&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>it seems easy to describe satan as either a facet of god or as having independence for the specific purpose of foiling plans</i>&#160;</p>
<p>there&#8217;s the whole ineffability bit, as described by gaiman and pratchett. &#160;</p>
<p><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://ssrdatta.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="sahelidatta at hotmail dot com">Saheli</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/01/judas-gets-a-makeover/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=543#comment-513</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m speaking metaphorically in a way. i have retained no major religions to represent my beliefs at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m speaking metaphorically in a way. i have retained no major religions to represent my beliefs at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/01/judas-gets-a-makeover/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=543#comment-512</guid>
		<description>it seems easy to describe satan as either a facet of god or as having independence for the specific purpose of foiling plans - there&#039;s just no way that satan couldn&#039;t be stopped cold if desired. this world today seems good evidence that god engages in contradictory behavior. it&#039;s very egotistical to assume that divine thinking runs along only one track.&#160;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Posted by&lt;a&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;david</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems easy to describe satan as either a facet of god or as having independence for the specific purpose of foiling plans &#8211; there&#8217;s just no way that satan couldn&#8217;t be stopped cold if desired. this world today seems good evidence that god engages in contradictory behavior. it&#8217;s very egotistical to assume that divine thinking runs along only one track.&#160;</p>
<p><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a>david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/01/judas-gets-a-makeover/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=543#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Probably a matter of interpretation, but you&#039;ll have to clarify how those three aren&#039;t mutually exclusive to you. Either Judas is God&#039;s instrument or he is Satan&#039;s. Or Satan isn&#039;t really the Enemy, opposing God&#039;s plan. (I find such absolutes absurd anyway, but never mind that.)&#160;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Posted by&lt;a&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://rhinocrisy.blogspot.com/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; TITLE=&quot;rednblack at alum dot mit dot edu&quot;&gt;saurabh&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably a matter of interpretation, but you&#8217;ll have to clarify how those three aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive to you. Either Judas is God&#8217;s instrument or he is Satan&#8217;s. Or Satan isn&#8217;t really the Enemy, opposing God&#8217;s plan. (I find such absolutes absurd anyway, but never mind that.)&#160;</p>
<p><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://rhinocrisy.blogspot.com/" REL="nofollow" TITLE="rednblack at alum dot mit dot edu">saurabh</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/01/judas-gets-a-makeover/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=543#comment-510</guid>
		<description>those 3 don&#039;t mutually exclude. also the centrality of temptation and betrayal itself calls into question the faultlessness of the storytelling, meaning that if #3 were &quot;true,&quot; we&#039;d never know it.&#160;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Posted by&lt;a&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;david</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those 3 don&#8217;t mutually exclude. also the centrality of temptation and betrayal itself calls into question the faultlessness of the storytelling, meaning that if #3 were &#8220;true,&#8221; we&#8217;d never know it.&#160;</p>
<p><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a>david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

