Comments on: War crimes http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/06/war-crimes/ Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:30:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Anonymous http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/06/war-crimes/#comment-1002 Anonymous Sat, 01 Jul 2006 16:22:38 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=644#comment-1002 seriously before the curtain closes on the republican federal legislature, shouldn't they shift their constitutional attention from flag burning to something they really care about, like amending the preamble from "promote the general welfare" to "protect dow 10,000"? what a legacy that would be. seriously before the curtain closes on the republican federal legislature, shouldn’t they shift their constitutional attention from flag burning to something they really care about, like amending the preamble from “promote the general welfare” to “protect dow 10,000″? what a legacy that would be.

]]> By: Anonymous http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/06/war-crimes/#comment-1001 Anonymous Sat, 01 Jul 2006 16:13:52 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=644#comment-1001 2nd on that as a good definition. hubris-on-hubris is how it's supposed to work. that things are cockeyed at the moment seems to be because it's a little optimistically individualist to assume that no conspiracy would ever be so large - and the economy would never be so hollow - as to generate a consensus around holding almost a maginot line of high level results regardless of results on the ground, or long term effects. it's a disaster. <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://rhinocrisy.blogspot.com/2006/06/war-crimes.html" REL="nofollow" TITLE="alohaflower at mindspring dot com">hibiscus</a> 2nd on that as a good definition. hubris-on-hubris is how it’s supposed to work. that things are cockeyed at the moment seems to be because it’s a little optimistically individualist to assume that no conspiracy would ever be so large - and the economy would never be so hollow - as to generate a consensus around holding almost a maginot line of high level results regardless of results on the ground, or long term effects. it’s a disaster. 

Posted by hibiscus

]]> By: sauravhttp://www.passtheroti.com http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/06/war-crimes/#comment-1000 sauravhttp://www.passtheroti.com Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:20:04 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=644#comment-1000 <i>when hubris runs into itself, at least a little bit.</i><br/><br/>This is a very good definition for "separation of powers" :) <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://www.passtheroti.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="saurav at passtheroti dot com">Saurav</a> when hubris runs into itself, at least a little bit.

This is a very good definition for “separation of powers” :) 

Posted by Saurav

]]> By: judevachttp://echan.wordpress.com http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/06/war-crimes/#comment-999 judevachttp://echan.wordpress.com Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:48:00 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=644#comment-999 I wasn't refering to Justice Roberts. <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a>judevac I wasn’t refering to Justice Roberts. 

Posted by judevac

]]> By: Anonymous http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/06/war-crimes/#comment-998 Anonymous Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:41:34 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=644#comment-998 Oh, come now, that's a bit unfair. The man had a conflict of interest, and he stayed away. He did what he was supposed to do. Give him that much credit.<br/><br/>Besides, our side would have won even if he HAD decided to stay on the bench. FIVE justices decided to uphold civil liberties. That's a majority. I'm willing to take a victory wherever I can get it. <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a>DearDarlingDidi Oh, come now, that’s a bit unfair. The man had a conflict of interest, and he stayed away. He did what he was supposed to do. Give him that much credit.

Besides, our side would have won even if he HAD decided to stay on the bench. FIVE justices decided to uphold civil liberties. That’s a majority. I’m willing to take a victory wherever I can get it. 

Posted by DearDarlingDidi

]]> By: Judevachttp://echan.wordpress.com http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/06/war-crimes/#comment-997 Judevachttp://echan.wordpress.com Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:19:37 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=644#comment-997 It still worries me that our civil liberties in "war" time depend upon the decision of one Supreme Court justice to stay on the bench or to continue breathing. <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://echan.wordpress.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="misschan at gmail dot com">judevac</a> It still worries me that our civil liberties in “war” time depend upon the decision of one Supreme Court justice to stay on the bench or to continue breathing. 

Posted by judevac

]]>