Comments on: Bruce talks sense http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/08/bruce-talks-sense/ Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:07:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Anonymous http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/08/bruce-talks-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1232 Anonymous Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:42:46 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=672#comment-1232 it's an absurdly easy thing to do to connect al-qaeda with fetal rights and the rapture and rap it all up in "liberals = death." so easy that it was like the flick of a switch to move arab terrorists from communist pawns to demonic spawn. the red cowards didn't disband with the end of the revolution was the hand of satan behind it <i>all!</i>  <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://rhinocrisy.blogspot.com/2006/08/bruce-talks-sense.html" REL="nofollow" TITLE="alohaflower at mindspring dot com">hibiscus</a> it’s an absurdly easy thing to do to connect al-qaeda with fetal rights and the rapture and rap it all up in “liberals = death.” so easy that it was like the flick of a switch to move arab terrorists from communist pawns to demonic spawn. the red cowards didn’t disband with the end of the revolution was the hand of satan behind it all!  

Posted by hibiscus

]]> By: Anonymous http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/08/bruce-talks-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1231 Anonymous Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:55:30 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=672#comment-1231 it's worse that the commie pinko thing. my sense of the phrase "they want to destroy america" is that the pre-9/11 meaning was more metaphorical, the death of the free state, not the human population. now it's the outright accusation of mass murder conspiracy. maybe it's just because there was an actual, successful "homeland" attack for emphasis but i don't think so. i think it's combined foreign affairs and anti-abortion language, through the religious conflict link. <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://rhinocrisy.blogspot.com/2006/08/bruce-talks-sense.html" REL="nofollow" TITLE="alohaflower at mindspring dot com">hibiscus</a> it’s worse that the commie pinko thing. my sense of the phrase “they want to destroy america” is that the pre-9/11 meaning was more metaphorical, the death of the free state, not the human population. now it’s the outright accusation of mass murder conspiracy. maybe it’s just because there was an actual, successful “homeland” attack for emphasis but i don’t think so. i think it’s combined foreign affairs and anti-abortion language, through the religious conflict link. 

Posted by hibiscus

]]> By: judevachttp://echan.wordpress.com http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/08/bruce-talks-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1230 judevachttp://echan.wordpress.com Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:43:18 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=672#comment-1230 Well, what's funnier is how we start classifying other "petty criminals" (i.e. anti-globalization protesters, ACLU members) or "meddlesome criminals" (high school kids shouting adolescent angst threats) as terrorists to throw the book at them. It's almost as though the T word has replaced the "Commie Pinko" labels of yore. It's so retro.  <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://echan.wordpress.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="misschan at gmail dot com">judevac</a> Well, what’s funnier is how we start classifying other “petty criminals” (i.e. anti-globalization protesters, ACLU members) or “meddlesome criminals” (high school kids shouting adolescent angst threats) as terrorists to throw the book at them. It’s almost as though the T word has replaced the “Commie Pinko” labels of yore. It’s so retro.  

Posted by judevac

]]> By: Anonymous http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/08/bruce-talks-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1229 Anonymous Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:51:16 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=672#comment-1229 Well said! <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://baboonlogic.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="anshul at baboonlogic dot com">Anshul</a> Well said! 

Posted by Anshul

]]> By: Anonymous http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/08/bruce-talks-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1228 Anonymous Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:45:00 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=672#comment-1228 they're <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bully" REL="nofollow">bulies</a> , and should be treated <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_infliction_of_emotional_distress" REL="nofollow">accordingly</a>. <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://rhinocrisy.blogspot.com/2006/08/bruce-talks-sense.html" REL="nofollow" TITLE="alohaflower at mindspring dot com">hibiscus</a> they’re bulies , and should be treated accordingly. 

Posted by hibiscus

]]>