<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Request permission to pick nits, sir.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/10/request-permission-to-pick-nits-sir/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/10/request-permission-to-pick-nits-sir/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:07:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/10/request-permission-to-pick-nits-sir/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=704#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>it looks like they deported the great lakes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;hmm. all the weapons listed lower on the page have a &quot;mission.&quot; for the small arms, the mission is always, &quot;deter, and if necessary, compel adversaries by enabling individuals and small units [to kill individuals and small units].&quot; does that work? does carrying a machine rifle really make you &lt;em&gt;less&lt;/em&gt; likely to be shot at? is there any scenario where people who are not armed are more likely to be killed than the people with the guns? i think the guns are a failure. maybe it&#039;s more mission creep.&#160;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Posted by&lt;a&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://sabdariffa.blogspot.com&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; TITLE=&quot;alohaflower at mindspring dot com&quot;&gt;hibiscus&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks like they deported the great lakes.</p>
<p>hmm. all the weapons listed lower on the page have a &#8220;mission.&#8221; for the small arms, the mission is always, &#8220;deter, and if necessary, compel adversaries by enabling individuals and small units [to kill individuals and small units].&#8221; does that work? does carrying a machine rifle really make you <em>less</em> likely to be shot at? is there any scenario where people who are not armed are more likely to be killed than the people with the guns? i think the guns are a failure. maybe it&#8217;s more mission creep.&#160;</p>
<p><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://sabdariffa.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="alohaflower at mindspring dot com">hibiscus</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

