Comments on: Song of experience http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/10/song-of-experience/ Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:07:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: balabo3_xv http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/10/song-of-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-72574 balabo3_xv Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:12:34 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=694#comment-72574 <a href="http://index1.phone-i.ru" rel="nofollow">???? ?????????? ??????</a> <a href="http://index2.phone-i.ru" rel="nofollow">????????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????</a> <a href="http://index3.phone-i.ru" rel="nofollow">??? ???? ???? ??????</a> <a href="http://index4.phone-i.ru" rel="nofollow">??????? ????? ??????</a> <a href="http://index5.phone-i.ru" rel="nofollow">xd1 x81 xd0 xb5 xba</a> ???? ?????????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ????? ??????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ?????? xd1 x81 xd0 xb5 xba

]]> By: saurabh http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/10/song-of-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1362 saurabh Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:12:06 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=694#comment-1362 This is priceless, from the IMDB "Team America: World Police" page:<br/>"MPAA: Rated R for graphic crude and sexual humor, violent images and strong language - all involving puppets." <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://rhinocrisy.blogspot.com/" REL="nofollow" TITLE="rednblack at alum dot mit dot edu">saurabh</a> This is priceless, from the IMDB “Team America: World Police” page:
“MPAA: Rated R for graphic crude and sexual humor, violent images and strong language – all involving puppets.” 

Posted by saurabh

]]> By: hibiscus http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/10/song-of-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1361 hibiscus Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:24:32 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=694#comment-1361 it's kind of nice being past the liberal side of stuff right now. i mean, virtually nobody will listen to me who has a real way to prevent the use of nuclear weapons. i feel free to keep trying to look long. if there were a big movement that was around saying, "nuclear weapons are exactly what's wrong with the big money approach to managing the world," i'd be there wearing bells because it'd imply that there was a larger trouble being addressed. i'm sick of puppet-dancing. bin laden, bushco, kim, who wants to work the strings next. <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://sabdariffa.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="alohaflower at mindspring dot com">hibiscus</a> it’s kind of nice being past the liberal side of stuff right now. i mean, virtually nobody will listen to me who has a real way to prevent the use of nuclear weapons. i feel free to keep trying to look long. if there were a big movement that was around saying, “nuclear weapons are exactly what’s wrong with the big money approach to managing the world,” i’d be there wearing bells because it’d imply that there was a larger trouble being addressed. i’m sick of puppet-dancing. bin laden, bushco, kim, who wants to work the strings next. 

Posted by hibiscus

]]> By: Anonymous http://rhinocrisy.org/2006/10/song-of-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1360 Anonymous Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:33:38 +0000 http://rhinocrisy.org/?p=694#comment-1360 You know, I don't find that completely comforting. B/c my little piece of relief when I first saw the news was, "oh, a nuclear bomb is only a 4.2? That's not so bad. It would take a 1000 bombs to make a really big earthquake." 1000 bombs is just on the side of, well, only two countries probably have that many, and I don't think they're THAT crazy. Bring that number down and it stresses me out. I probably watched Superman I too many times as a child, but causing earthquakes (and relative containment of radiation) seems like a horribly effective use of the weapon, and one that would cause fewer hesitations than the standard drop from above scenario.  <br/><br/><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://www.sahelidatta.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="sahelidatta at hotmail dot com">Saheli</a> You know, I don’t find that completely comforting. B/c my little piece of relief when I first saw the news was, “oh, a nuclear bomb is only a 4.2? That’s not so bad. It would take a 1000 bombs to make a really big earthquake.” 1000 bombs is just on the side of, well, only two countries probably have that many, and I don’t think they’re THAT crazy. Bring that number down and it stresses me out. I probably watched Superman I too many times as a child, but causing earthquakes (and relative containment of radiation) seems like a horribly effective use of the weapon, and one that would cause fewer hesitations than the standard drop from above scenario.  

Posted by Saheli

]]>